Admin مدير المنتدى
![مدير المنتدى مدير المنتدى](https://2img.net/i/itest/ranks/stars/stars13.gif)
![Admin](https://2img.net/u/1711/56/32/51/avatars/1-20.jpg)
عدد المساهمات : 18928 التقييم : 35294 تاريخ التسجيل : 01/07/2009 الدولة : مصر العمل : مدير منتدى هندسة الإنتاج والتصميم الميكانيكى
![كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom Empty](https://2img.net/i/fa/empty.gif) | موضوع: كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom الثلاثاء 04 يونيو 2024, 12:09 pm | |
| ![](https://i.servimg.com/u/f61/15/36/74/14/subscr10.gif)
أخواني في الله أحضرت لكم كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom
![كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom R_c_m_11](https://i.servimg.com/u/f61/15/36/74/14/r_c_m_11.jpg) و المحتوى كما يلي :
Identify system functions, features and consequences Hidden failure modes in plant and equipment Run-to-Failure componentsand limitations Understanding systems analysis Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xix Chapter 1 Introduction to RCM 1 1.1 Uncovering the Fuzziness and Mystique of RCM 4 1.2 The Background of RCM 9 1.3 A No-Nonsense Approach to RCM 11 1.4 RCM as a Major Factor in the Bottom Line 12 Chapter 2 Why RCM Has Historically Been So Difficult to Implement 15 2.1 Consultants 15 2.2 A White Elephant 16 2.3 Reasons for Failure 18 2.3.1 Loss of In-House Control 18 2.3.2 An Incorrect Mix of Personnel Performing the Analysis 19 2.3.3 Unnecessary and Costly Administrative Burdens 20 2.3.4 Fundamental RCM Concepts Not Understood 21 2.3.5 Confusion Determining System Functions 21 2.3.6 Confusion Concerning System Boundaries and Interfaces 21 2.3.7 Divergent Expectations 23 2.3.8 Confusion Regarding Convention 24 2.3.9 Misunderstanding “Hidden” Failures and Redundancy 24 2.3.10 Misunderstanding Run-to-Failure 25 2.3.11 Inappropriate Component Classifications 25 2.3.12 Instruments Were Not Included as Part of the RCM Analysis 26 Chapter 3 Fundamental RCM Concepts Explained, Some for the Very First Time:The Next Plateau 27 3.1 The Three Phases of an RCM-Based Preventive Maintenance Program 30 3.2 The Three Cornerstones of RCM 32 3.3 Hidden Failures, Redundancy, and Critical Components 34 3.4 Testing Hidden Systems 45 For more information about this title, click here3.5 The Missing Link: Potentially Critical Components 46 3.6 Commitment Components 50 3.7 Economic Components 51 3.8 The “Canon Law” of Run-to-Failure Components 52 3.9 The Integration of Preventive and Corrective Maintenance and the Distinction Between Potentially Critical and Run-to-Failure Components 57 3.9.1 An RTF CM versus a Critical CM: Which Takes Priority for Getting Worked First? 59 3.10 The Anatomy of a Disaster 61 3.11 A Deeper Look at Critical Components, Potentially Critical Components, and Hidden Failures—How They All Fit Together 65 3.12 Finding the Anomalies 68 3.13 Failures Found During Operator Rounds 70 3.14 Redundant, Standby, and Backup Functions 70 3.15 Typical Examples of Component Classifications 73 3.16 Component Classification Hierarchy 73 3.17 The Defensive Strategies of a PM Program 75 3.18 Eliminating the Requirement for Identifying Boundaries and Interfaces 75 3.19 Functions and Functional Failures Are Identified at the Component Level, Not the System and Subsystem Level 77 3.20 The Quest for the Consequence of Failure 79 3.21 The COFA versus the FMEA 81 3.22 How Do You Know When Your Plant Is Reliable? 83 3.23 Chapter Summary 85 Chapter 4 RCM Implementation: Preparation and Tools 89 4.1 Preparation 90 4.2 The Sequential Elements Needed for the Analysis 91 4.2.1 A Simple but Comprehensive Alphanumeric Equipment I.D. Database 91 4.2.2 Informational Resources 93 4.2.3 Establishing Convention 94 4.2.4 Specialized Workstations and Software 94 4.2.5 The COFA Excel Spreadsheet versus the FMEA 95 4.2.6 The PM Task Worksheet 100 4.2.7 The Economic Evaluation Worksheet 102 4.3 Chapter Summary 105 Chapter 5 RCM Made Simple: Implementation Process 107 5.1 Define Your Asset Reliability Strategy 109 5.2 Understanding the RCM COFA Logic Tree, the Potentially Critical Guideline, and the Economically Significant Guideline 112 5.3 Completing the COFA Worksheet in Conjunction with the COFA Logic Tree, the Potentially Critical Guideline, and the Economically Significant Guideline 120 5.3.1 Describe the Component Functions 121 viii ContentsContents ix 5.3.2 Describe the Functional Failures 123 5.3.3 Describe the Dominant Component Failure Modes for Each Functional Failure 124 5.3.4 Is the Occurrence of the Failure Mode Evident? 124 5.3.5 Describe the System Effect for Each Failure Mode 126 5.3.6 Describe the Consequence of Failure Based on the Asset Reliability Criteria You Selected 129 5.3.7 Define the Component Classification 129 5.4 RCM Serves as a Translation of the Design Objectives 131 5.5 Companion Equipment 133 5.6 The SAE Standard: Document JA1011 134 5.7 A Real-Life Analysis: Averting a Potentially Devastating Plant Consequence 135 5.8 Why Streamlined RCM Methods Are Not Recommended 141 5.8.1 Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) 142 5.8.2 Reliability-Based Maintenance (RBM) 142 5.8.3 Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) Based Maintenance 142 5.8.4 80/20 Rule 142 5.9 Chapter Summary 143 5.10 RCM Made “Difficult” 147 5.10.1 Determine System Boundaries 148 5.10.2 Determine Subsystem Boundaries 148 5.10.3 Determine Interfaces 149 5.10.4 Determine Functions 149 5.10.5 Determine the Functional Failures 150 5.10.6 Determine Which Equipment Is Responsible for the Functional Failures 150 Chapter 6 The PM Task Selection Process 153 6.1 Understanding Preventive Maintenance Task Terminology 154 6.2 Condition-Directed,Time-Directed, and Failure-Finding Tasks 154 6.3 The PM Task Worksheet 157 6.4 The PM Task Selection Logic Tree 158 6.5 Why a Condition-Directed Task Is Preferred 161 6.6 Determining the PM Task Frequency and Interval 162 6.6.1 The Optimum Time to Establish a Reliability Program 165 6.7 Is a Design Change Recommended? 166 6.8 Completing a Typical PM Task Worksheet 167 6.9 Institute Technical Restraints 168 6.10 A Sampling Strategy 169 6.11 Common Mode Failures 171 6.12 Different Predictive Maintenance (PdM) Techniques 172 6.12.1 Vibration Monitoring and Analysis 172 6.12.2 Acoustic Monitoring 173 6.12.3 Thermography or Infrared Monitoring 173 6.12.4 Oil Sampling and Analysis 173 6.12.5 X-ray or Radiography Inspection 173 6.12.6 Magnetic Particle Inspection 1746.12.7 Eddy Current Testing 174 6.12.8 Ultrasonic Testing 174 6.12.9 Liquid Penetrant 174 6.12.10 Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) 174 6.12.11 Boroscope Inspections 174 6.12.12 Diagnostics for Motor-Operated Valves 175 6.12.13 Diagnostics for Air-Operated Valves 175 6.13 Chapter Summary 175 Chapter 7 RCM for Instruments 181 7.1 Instrument Categories 182 7.2 Instrument Design Tolerance Criteria 183 7.3 The Instrument Logic Tree 185 7.3.1 Block 1: Is the Instrument a Functional Instrument? 185 7.3.2 Block 2: Instrument Is Analyzed in the COFA Worksheet and the PM Task Selection Worksheet. 185 7.3.3 Block 3: Can the Instrument Reading Result in an Operator Having to Initiate Some Kind of Action? 185 7.3.4 Block 4: A PM Is Required. Calibration Criteria and Periodicity Guidance Are as Follows. 186 7.3.5 Block 5: Were the Last Three Successive Calibrations Within Vendor Tolerance Criteria? 186 7.3.6 Block 6: Periodicity Extension Is Allowed. 187 7.3.7 Block 7: Reduce Periodicity or Implement a Design Change. 187 7.3.8 Block 8: Is the Instrument Redundant? 187 7.3.9 Block 9: Is an Indication Comparison Applicable? 187 7.3.10 Block 10: Is the Consequence of Excessive Drift (to the Point of Instrument Failure) Acceptable? 188 7.3.11 Block 11: A Calibration PM Is Optional. 189 7.3.12 Block 12: A PM Is Required. Calibration Criteria and Periodicity Guidance Are as Follows. 189 7.3.13 Block 13: Were the Last Two Successive Calibrations Within a +/−2.5 Percent Accuracy Tolerance? 189 7.3.14 Block 14: Periodicity Extension Is Allowed. 189 7.3.15 Block 15: Were the Last Two Successive Calibrations Within a +/−5.0 Percent Accuracy Tolerance? 189 7.3.16 Block 16: Periodicity Extension Is Not Allowed. 190 7.3.17 Block 17: Reduce Periodicity or Implement a Design Change. 190 7.4 Chapter Summary 190 Chapter 8 The RCM Living Program 193 8.1 A Model for an RCM Living Program 194 8.1.1 The Craft Feedback Evaluation Element 196 8.1.2 The Corrective Maintenance (CM) Evaluation Element 203 8.1.3 The “Other Inputs” Element 205 8.1.3.1 Root-Cause Evaluations 206 8.1.3.2 Vendor Bulletins 206 8.1.3.3 Regulatory Bulletins 207 8.1.3.4 Industry Failure Data 207 8.1.3.5 Engineering Evaluations 208 x Contents8.1.3.6 Plant Design Changes 208 8.1.3.7 New Commitments 208 8.1.4 Monitoring and Trending 209 8.1.5 The RCM Analysis Element 209 8.1.6 Equipment Database 210 8.1.7 The PM Audit 210 8.2 Chapter Summary 212 Chapter 9 An RCM Monitoring and Trending Strategy 217 9.1 What Is Reliability and How Do You Measure It? 218 9.2 Monitoring Reliability Is Like Monitoring the Human Body 220 9.3 Caution: Avoid Analysis Paralysis Performance Monitoring 220 9.4 The Aggregate Metrics 222 9.4.1 Unplanned Plant or Facility Trips 223 9.4.2 Capacity Factor 224 9.4.3 Unplanned Operator Actions 224 9.4.4 Unplanned Power Reductions 225 9.4.5 Production Delays 225 9.4.6 Enforcement Actions 226 9.4.7 Litigation Occurrences 226 9.4.8 Citations and Violations 227 9.4.9 Root-Cause Evaluations 227 9.4.10 Injuries 228 9.4.11 Rate of Written CMs 228 9.4.12 Overdue CM Backlog 229 9.4.13 Overdue PM Backlog 229 9.5 Weighting Factors 230 9.6 Performance Calculations 231 9.7 Performance Graph 235 9.8 Performance Graph by System 237 9.9 A Final Caution 239 9.10 Benchmarking 239 9.11 More About Expected Performance Rates 241 9.12 Avoid Reliability Complacency 241 9.13 How to Maintain Your Reliability Performance 242 9.14 Chapter Summary 246 Chapter 10 RCM Implementation Made Simple—Epilogue 249 10.1 RCM as a Plant Culture 249 10.2 A Step-by-Step Review of the Process 251 10.2.1 Select an RCM Point of Contact 251 10.2.2 Review the Reasons for RCM Program Failures 255 10.2.3 Understand the Concepts 255 10.2.4 Define Your Asset Reliability Criteria 255 10.2.5 Establish Your Alphanumeric Equipment Database 256 10.2.6 Analyze Each Component Function in the COFA Logic Tree 256 10.2.7 Analyze Each Component Function in the Potentially Critical Guideline 257 Contents xi10.2.8 Analyze Each Component Function in the Economically Significant Guideline 257 10.2.9 Enter All Data in the COFA Worksheet 258 10.2.10 Classify Each Component 258 10.2.11 Analyze All Classified Components Except Run-to-Failure Components in the PM Task Selection Logic Tree 258 10.2.12 Document All Tasks and Periodicities on the PM Task Worksheet 258 10.2.13 Analyze Instruments in the Instrument Logic Tree 259 10.2.14 Develop Your RCM Living Program 259 10.2.15 Establish Monitoring and Trending Program Metrics 260 10.2.16 Establish Your Expected Performance Rate 260 10.2.17 Establish Your Actual Performance Rate 261 10.2.18 Establish Your Trend Graphs 261 10.2.19 Maintain Continued Vigilance Over Your Program 261 10.3 Taking Command of Your Own Ship 262 Glossary 265 Bibliography 285 Index 287 Index Age, relationship to failure, 162–163, 178 Aggregate metrics, 10, 217–223, 239–240, 260–261 as part of performance graphs, 237 weighting factors for, 230 “Applicable and effective,” 30, 67, 80–82, 117, 158–160 instrument-related, 182 versus nonapplicable and effective, 169 in phase 2 of RCM, 131 and PM Worksheet, 100 when it cannot be defined, 112 Asset reliability criteria, 30, 50, 80–82, 100, 209, 255–256 defining, 107, 109–119, 129–132, 139, 144 as part of aggregate metrics, 225 as part of COFA, 157 as part of PM Task Worksheet, 157 typical examples of, 111 (See also Qualifying conditions) Backup components and functions (see Standby components and functions) Bathtub curve, 161–162, 244 Benchmarking, 239 Boundaries, 3, 256, 262 associated with RCM made “difficult,” 147–149 confusion concerning, 21–22 eliminating requirement for, 75–78, 98–99 unnecessary, 28, 34, 92 Cannon law for run-to-failure, 4, 25, 27, 52–58, 68–70, 86, 255 definition of, 54–55 Causes of failure, 79, 87, 94, 102, 116, 153–154, 158–162, 167–168, 256 (See also Credible failure cause; Piece parts) Classifications (see Component classifications) COFA, 87, 107–108, 146–147, 208–210, 214, 255–259 compared to SAE Standard, 134 defined, 4, 28 as first stage of RCM filter, 119–120 versus FMEA, 81–82, 95 for instruments, 182, 185, 190 integrated with PM task selection logic, 153, 157, 169 for plant design changes, 208 reason for, 82, 90–100 understanding of, 112–115, 119–140 COFA Logic Tree, 82, 124, 137–139, 146, 256–258 diagram of, 113 as first stage of RCM filter, 119–121 understanding of, 112–115, 119–140 (See also COFA) COFA worksheet, 82, 97, 100, 105, 108, 121–132, 137, 146, 157, 258 for instruments, 185 for plant design changes, 208 understanding of, 112–115 (See also COFA; COFA Logic Tree) Commitment components, 26, 50–55, 74–75, 82, 86, 146, 160, 178, 257–258 in living RCM program, 204–210 in PM strategy, 50–51, 74, 100, 112 related to implementation process, 112–119 related to instruments, 186 as third stage of RCM filter, 119 Common mode failures, 43, 171, 187 Companion equipment, 133 Component(s), 6–7, 17–18, 21–22 alphanumeric database of, 91–92 analyzing, 77–78, 93 assigned at specific I.D. number, 93 classifications of, 73–74 default, 67 grouping of, 34 Copyright 2006 by the McGraw-Hill Companies. Click here for terms of use.Component(s) (Cont.): inappropriate classifications of, 25–26 as sole level of importance, 22 staying at level of, 34, 42, 45 subtle classification differences of, 40 synonymous with equipment, 78–79 (See also Commitment components; Critical components; Economic components; Potentially critical components; Run-to-failure components) Component classifications, 56, 72–74, 110, 113, 129, 131 examples of, 72–73 hierarchy of, 73–74 Concepts of RCM, 3–4, 8, 13–14, 18, 55–56, 68–69, 85–86, 255 for averting disaster, 61–65 explained for first time, 27–34 if misunderstood, 21 pertaining to hidden failures and redundancy, 24–28 as preparation for RCM implementation, 105 Condition-directed task, 154–156, 159–162, 172, 175–176, 205, 212, 258 (See also Bathtub curve; Failurefinding task; Time-directed task) Confusion surrounding RCM, 17, 46, 82, 262 regarding convention, 24, 94, 154 regarding system boundaries and interfaces, 21 regarding system functions, 70 regarding traditional renditions of RCM, 114 Consequence of failure, 4–6, 27–28, 85, 87, 115, 255–256 anomalies and, 68 and asset reliability criteria, 100, 129 in bigger picture, 59–61 depending on how function is written, 67 economics of, 27 final destination of, 82 independent of component pedigree, 81 for instruments, 182, 190 potential result of, 37–39, 48 quest for, 21, 79 as ultimate objective of PM program, 57 Consequence of failure analysis (COFA) (see COFA) Consultants, 3, 11, 13, 15–16, 95, 251, 255, 262 Convention terminology, 24, 91, 105, 269 for failure modes, 94 for instruments, 181 for PM tasks, 154 Cornerstones of RCM, 3, 32 Corrective maintenance (CM), 8, 24–25, 39, 53–61, 81, 114, 157, 186 as integral part of run-to-failure, 27, 45, 53–61, 68–69, 86 as part of living RCM program, 195–196, 200, 203–204, 210, 213 as part of monitoring and trending, 229, 244 Craft feedback, 10, 196–202, 210, 213, 259 Credible failure cause, 160, 167–168 versus noncredible failure cause, 116 Critical components, 17, 26, 34–35, 39–40, 52, 69, 85, 255–257 beginning logic process by defining, 113–119 deeper look at, 65 as first stage of RCM filter, 119 as part of component hierarchy, 73–74 as part of defensive PM program strategy, 75 and sampling strategy, 169–170 Demand mode of operation, 33, 36, 45–46, 67, 126, 155 (See also Normal mode of operation) Design change, 43, 64, 86, 112, 134, 141, 208, 224, 245 and craft feedback element, 198 for critical and potentially critical components, 119 depending on applicable and effective task, 160 for instruments, 184–191 recommendation criteria for, 166–168, 204 Disasters, 2, 141 Divergent expectations, 23 Dominant failure mode, 98–99, 167–168 defined, 116, 146 described for each functional failure, 124–130, 138 288 IndexEconomic components, 51, 75, 82–83, 86, 102, 160, 178, 258 in economic evaluation worksheet, 113 as fourth stage of RCM filter, 119 included in equipment database, 210 Economically significant guideline, 112–120, 146, 153, 204, 257–258 illustrated, 114 instrument-related, 182, 190 as part of RCM filter, 119 Equipment (see Component) Evident failures, 10, 29, 33–55, 63–70, 82, 85–86, 258 as first question to RCM COFA decision logic, 115–118 as part of COFA worksheet, 124–132 Evident indication (see Evident failures) Facility, 12, 129 synonymous with plant, 272 (See also Types of facilities) Failure: age-related (see Age, relationship to failure) causes of (see Credible failure cause) effect of (see COFA; Consequence of failure) evident (see Evident failures) hidden (see Hidden failures) Failure-finding task, 43, 46, 154–156, 160, 167, 178, 258 (See also Condition-directed task; Time-directed task) Failure modes (see Dominant failure mode; Hidden failure mode) Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA): versus COFA, 81–82, 87 versus COFA spreadsheet, 95–100 as part of RCM made “difficult,” 147–148 Frequency and interval (see Periodicity) Functions, 12, 45, 87, 91, 93, 121, 138, 145, 256–258 described, 121, 123–125 grouping not allowed for, 34, 202 not required at system level, 22, 28 related to companion equipment, 133 specified at component level, 34, 76–82, 98–99 Functions (Cont.): (See also Confusion surrounding RCM, regarding system functions; Standby functions) Functional failures, 77, 80, 91, 99, 110, 123–124, 150, 258 (See also Functions) Health of plant, 217–231, 247 Hidden failure mode, 66 (See also Hidden failures) Hidden failures, 3–4, 24–25, 66, 255 applicability to failure-finding tasks, 155, 178 deeper look at, 65 as first question to RCM COFA decision logic, 115–118 not part of RTF philosophy, 52–55, 64–65 related to missing link, 46–50, 85 understanding more about, 27–42 Hidden functions, 274 (See also Hidden failures) Hidden systems, 25 (See also Evident failures; Hidden failures; Hidden functions; Standby functions; Testing hidden systems) Immediate effect, 25, 39, 46–49, 57 (See also Critical components) Initiating events, 47–50, 68, 75, 85, 155, 160 and Potentially Critical Guideline, 114, 118, 139, 257 Instrument logic tree, 182–183, 259 (See also Instruments) Instruments, 14, 26, 87, 181–191, 259 Interfaces (see Boundaries) In-house control, 7, 16–19, 95, 109 Living RCM program, 10, 13–14, 79, 165, 193–215, 259–260 analysis element, 209 corrective maintenance element, 203 craft feedback element (see Craft feedback) engineering evaluations, 208 equipment database, 210 industry failure data, 207 monitoring and trending, 208 new commitments, 208 other inputs, 205 Index 289Living RCM program (Cont.): plant design changes, 208 PM audit, 210 regulatory bulletins, 207 root-cause evaluations, 206 vendor bulletins, 206 Living RCM program model, illustrated, 195 Misunderstanding: of hidden failures, 24 of redundancy, 70 of run-to-failure, 25 Missing link, 18, 46, 64–65, 85, 255 (See also Potentially critical components) Monitoring and trending, 10, 195–196, 217–245, 260–261 of equipment versus facility, 209 Multiple failures, 4, 25, 32–69, 85, 255 Normal mode of operation, 33, 45–47, 66–67, 71–73, 85–87, 126, 178 (See also Demand mode of operation) Normally active (see Normal mode of operation) Normally inactive (see Demand mode of operation) Operability testing (see Testing hidden systems) Operator rounds, 70, 116–117, 124, 186 Operational criteria (see Asset reliability criteria) Optimum state, 244–245, 248, 261 Performance, 13–14, 84, 195, 209, 214, 260 calculations, 230–235 comparison with human body, 220–222 monitoring strategy, 221 plant metrics of, 217, 219, 222–230 weighting factors of, 230–231 (See also Aggregate metrics; Monitoring and trending; Performance graphs; Performance rates) Performance graph(s), 235–240, 261 Performance rate(s), 219, 223, 234–236, 241, 247, 260–261 actual, 234–235, 247, 261 expected, 234–236, 241, 247, 260–261 Periodicity, 81, 83, 153, 156, 163–165, 210, 212–213, 246, 248 and craft feedback, 196, 198–200, 203 defined, 9–10 determining optimum for, 164–165 for PdM tasks, 172 for instruments, 182–191 related to grace period, 230 Phases of RCM, 8, 29–31, 85, 131, 153 Piece parts, 79, 87, 93, 102, 162, 256 (See also Causes of failure) Plant (see Facility) Potential failure, of given component, 48 Potentially critical components, 4, 8, 18, 27, 29, 37, 42–58, 62–69, 73–75, 82–83, 100, 110–120, 133, 137–141, 255–258 deeper look at, 65 and failure-finding tasks, 160, 178 and multiple failures, 48–49 as second stage of RCM filter, 119 and time, 48–49 (See also Missing link; Potentially Critical Guideline) Potentially Critical Guideline, 112–120, 139–140 illustrated, 114 as part of RCM filter, 119 (See also Potentially critical components) Predictive maintenance (PdM), 30, 83, 155–159, 170 types of, 172–175 (See also Condition-directed task) Preventive maintenance (PM), 1–13, 46–47, 67–68, 107, 112, 250, 256 and aggregate metrics, 223–229 compared to defensive strategy of football team, 75 and complacency, 241–246 for instruments, 181–182 integrated with corrective maintenance, 57–59 and living RCM program, 194, 203–214 maintaining vigilance of, 261–262 as means of translating plant design objectives, 131 monitoring of, 237–241 and operator rounds, 70 as part of canon law for run-tofailure, 53–57 290 IndexPM task selection logic tree for, 159, 211, 258 and PM Task Worksheet, 100, 158 three phases of, 30–32 understanding PM task terminology for, 154–157 Qualifying conditions, 109–111, 146, 225, 256 (See also Asset reliability criteria) RCM (see Reliability centered maintenance) RCM concepts (see Concepts of RCM) RCM decision logic tree (see COFA Logic Tree) RCM filter, 119–120 RCM living program (see Living RCM program) RCM pitfalls, 13–15, 18, 26 Redundancy, 3, 8, 17, 34–37, 43, 50, 62–64, 70–73, 255 misunderstanding of, 24–25 (See also Standby functions) Reliability, 3–5, 12–13, 27, 33, 65, 193, 250–262 complacency about, 241–242 maintaining performance of, 242–248 measuring, 217–239 optimum time to establish program for, 165 Reliability centered maintenance (RCM), 1–14 classical, 5–6, 28, 76, 79, 87, 175 definition of, 8 “made difficult,” 147–151 not defined as PM reduction program, 16, 23 as plant culture, 249–251 streamlined, 5–7, 141–143, 147–148 as white elephant, 16 Run-to-failure, 1, 4, 8, 25–26, 37, 52–58, 258 anomalies, 68–69 canon law for, 54–55 in component classifications, 73–74 versus economic component, 102 in equipment database, 210 as misunderstood orphan of reliability, 53, 56, 61 as part of bigger picture, 59 in RCM filter, 119–120 (See also Canon law for run-to-failure) SAE Standard, 14, 29, 80–81, 99, 134–135, 147, 210 Safety criteria (see Asset reliability criteria) Sampling strategy, 169–171 Single failure, 3–4, 33–37, 50–55, 62–64, 75, 85, 117, 255 Single point of contact (SPOC), 90, 108, 211, 251 Sleeper cell, 7, 37, 43–48, 64, 141 Standby components and functions, 3–4, 25, 34–40, 66–67, 70–73, 86–87, 255 analyzing, 45 Testing hidden systems, 41–42, 45–47, 62, 64–65, 85 Time-directed task, 155, 159–162, 258 (See also Bathtub curve; Conditiondirected task; Failure-finding task) Timely manner, 38–39, 45, 53–58, 68 (See also Canon law for run-tofailure; Run-to-failure) Types of facilities, 12, 272 Unnecessary burdens, 20, 28–29, 77 Work control organization, 30–31, 204
كلمة سر فك الضغط : books-world.net The Unzip Password : books-world.net أتمنى أن تستفيدوا من محتوى الموضوع وأن ينال إعجابكم رابط من موقع عالم الكتب لتنزيل كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom رابط مباشر لتنزيل كتاب Reliability Centered Maintenance - Implementation Made Simple Neil Bloom ![](https://i.servimg.com/u/f61/15/36/74/14/sign_110.gif)
|
|